<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Neighborhood Effects - Latest Comments in Introducing Competition to Public Schools</title><link>http://neighborhoodeffects.disqus.com/</link><description>State &amp; Localy Policy from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University</description><atom:link href="https://neighborhoodeffects.disqus.com/introducing_competition_to_public_schools/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 08:05:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Introducing Competition to Public Schools</title><link>http://neighborhoodeffects.mercatus.org/2009/05/26/introducing-competition-to-public-schools/#comment-11032633</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Vouchers debate is being rekindled  in UK,  in lead up to next years election particularly  the idea of a pupil premium  ie voucher given to the most disadvantaged pupils to encourage good schools to take them  on, because of the extra funding that follows  them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some variant of the Swedish model appeals but even the conservative party (centre right) is very wary of vouchers even though the current school funding system does nothing to improve the lot of the most disadvantaged or to improve social mobility. In fact despite billions of investment in last twelve years if anything mobility has decilned here in UK. USA has similar problems and challenges.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">montrose42</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 08:05:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>